Subscribe to School Law Newsletter
Close Window

Category: Case Updates

Court decisions from across the country have implications right here in Ohio. Here is a selection of recent cases, and why they matter.

Incomplete Transcripts of Testimony Lead to Case Dismissals

In the case of Tuscarawas County Public Defender’s Office v. Kristy Goudy, 2021-Ohio-1754, the Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled that the State Personnel Board of Review’s failure to submit the complete transcript of testimony from their investigation resulted in prejudice to the Public Defender’s Office and dismissed the case. The agency investigated the dismissal […]

Remote Learning Impacts Civil Rights Considerations

The United States Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights released guidance regarding the civil rights implications for special education students in remote instruction. Remote instruction has a direct impact on each school’s obligation to provide free access to a public education (“FAPE”) to students with disabilities. The guidance states that school districts are not […]

Sovereign Immunity Defeats Homeowner’s Word

In the case of Martin v. Payne, 2021-Ohio-1557, an Ohio Appellate Court held that sovereign immunity protected the Village of Payne from liability because the homeowners must offer more than their own word as evidence of negligence. In this case, homeowners brought a claim against the Village of Payne for the negligent maintenance, inspection, and […]

Parliamentary Rules May Not Invalidate Otherwise Lawful Actions

In the case of State ex rel. Smith v. Gowdy, 2021-Ohio-1730, the Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals held that parliamentary rules are intended to assist in the orderly conduct of business, and the failure to follow such rules will not invalidate otherwise lawful actions. In this case, the individual argued for reinstatement as East […]

Arbitration May Be Enforced Without Signatures or a Party Being Named

In the case of One Lifestyle, Ltd. v. Mohiuddin, 2021-Ohio-1594, the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals held that an employer may enforce an arbitration agreement even if the employer was not specifically named in the agreement and the employer did not sign the agreement. An employee of One Lifestyle argued that the arbitration agreement […]