Subscribe to School Law Newsletter
Close Window

Court Did Not Abuse Discretion in Ordering Modification to an Administrative Agency Order

In the case of Makse v. Summit Cty. Executive, 2021-Ohio-2026, the Ninth District Court of Appeals upheld a decision modifying a disciplinary order for a Social Programs Supervisor.

The city argued that it was improper for the court to make such a modification and requested that the original order implementing a six-month suspension and mandated training be reinstated.

The Court of Appeals found that the lower court properly weighed all of the facts and information in the record to review the administrative decision and upheld the modification to the order.

To read this case, click here.

Authors: Matthew John Markling and the McGown & Markling Team.

Note: This blog entry does not constitute – nor does it contain – legal advice. Legal jurisprudence is like the always-changing Midwestern weather. As a result, this single blog entry cannot substitute for consultation with a McGown & Markling attorney. If legal advice is needed with respect to a specific factual situation, please feel free to contact a McGown & Markling attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.