Subscribe to School Law Newsletter
Close Window

Category: Case Updates

Court decisions from across the country have implications right here in Ohio. Here is a selection of recent cases, and why they matter.

Secret Ballot Voting Violates the Ohio Open Meetings Act

In the case of State ex rel. More Bratenahl v. Bratenahl, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-3233, the Ohio Supreme Court held that public bodies may not take official action by secret ballot. In this case, a city council voted on a new president pro tempore at a public meeting via secret ballot under the belief that […]

Common Pleas Courts May Hear Consumer Claims Against Public Universities

In the case Krueck v. Youngstown State Univ., 2019-Ohio-3219, an Ohio appellate court held that a court of common pleas has the power to hear consumer claims of unfair or deceptive practices against a public university. In this case, a student enrolled in a nursing home administrator program at Youngstown State University after the university’s […]

School Employees May Be Disciplined for Misconduct While On Leave

In the case of Pilato v. Nordonia Hills City Schools Bd. of Edn., 2019-Ohio-3085, an Ohio appeals court held that a school district and its business manager were not liable for disability discrimination and retaliation after an employee resigned following a dispute over the employee’s misconduct while the employee was on approved leave. In this […]

Redacted Checks Satisfy Public Records Request

In the case Ebersole v. City of Powell, 2019-Ohio-3073, an Ohio appellate court held that producing checks with redacted banking account information satisfies the requirements of the Ohio Public Records Act. In this case, the City of Powell produced copies of checks paid as part of a litigation settlement pursuant to a public records request. […]

Words Matter – An Exclusion Clause May Not Bar All Arbitrations

In the case of Toledo Fedn. of Teachers v. Bd. of Edn. of the Toledo City School Dist., 2019-Ohio-3025, an Ohio appellate court held that an exclusion clause that merely requires prospective application of arbitration decisions to similar, not-yet-filed grievances did not, by its plain language, bar arbitration of a pending grievance. In this case, […]